FERDINAND BATIN, ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA 408.882.2296 (fax) smanoukian@scscourt.org http://www.scscourt.org (For Clerk's Use Only) CASE NO. 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title (Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL COORDINATION 3.550) PROCEEDING NO. 12 WILLIAM SHUFF, an individual; and JOHN HOWLAND, an individual, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR LEAVE 14 Plaintiffs, TO FILE SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; DEFENDANTS 15 vs. MOTION FOR TERMINATING SANCTIONS Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET. inclusive, RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. I. If the tentative ruling does not require appearances, and is accepted, no appearance is necessary. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. RICHARD JACKSON ET AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE. 26 This is a putative class action. These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Family Law Tentative Rulings. Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First Please wait a moment while we load this page. Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is no longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter. TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT. 21 I. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. the hearing and listen to the tentative ruling. TONGTAI MACHINE AND TOOL CO., LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC., ET AL. You are using an outdated browser. GARDEN CITY, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL. Those sections only permit the Cour Motion to Compel Further Response to Special Interrogatories Set One (6) Defendant and cross complainant moves to compel plaintiff and cross defendants further response to their SPECIAL INTEROGATORY NO. V. CITY OF SANTA CLARA, ET AL. the following information in the notice: Pursuant to Local Rule 1.06 (A), the court will Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. INTRODUCTION CASE NO. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Department 13, Honorable James L. Stoelker, Presiding for Department 2, Honorable Patricia M. Lucas Bob Gutierrez, Courtroom Clerk Aura Clendenen, Court Reporter 191 North First Street, San Jose, CA 95113 Telephone: 408. Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. TERRESTRIAL DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL. Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. I. This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff in al. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. A. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. 16 Defendant. 23 I. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. WESTLAKE FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS OF CAL. Any argument is limited to five minutes. This action for breach of contract, business torts, and related claims was filed by Plaintiff and Cross-Defendant SinCo Technologies PTE LTD (SinCo) in 2016. Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. 1) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4; GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. directory, between the hours of 2:00 p.m. and 4:00 p.m. on the court day before To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. AND CASE NAMES MARK GOMEZ VS. (Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings.). ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and DIETER SPICKER VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN SAN JOSE LUXURY IMPORTS, CASEY KNOX AND MERCADO ANIMA VS. CLAIMS AND ALLEGATIONS AN IMPORTS OF STEVENS CREEK, HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION. Background Notice of non-opposition filed. Civil Index. 2 However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. will be able to access it on trellis. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. INTRODUCTION V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 To refresh your browser press F5 on the keyboard. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Agency (9th Cir. According to the separate statement in support of said motion SPECIAL INTERROGATORY NO. 17 Corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, You can always see your envelopes Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. INTRODUCTION Factual and Procedural Background On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). Covid-19 Notice: Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health, masks and/or other . If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. PORTFOLIO RECOVERY ASSOCIATES. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. 50, inclusive, This is a personal injury action. Motion to compel granted. I. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. The tentative rulings will become the ruling of the Court unless a party desires to be heard. 7 court's Web site for tentative rulings to determine if an appearance You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Tentative Rulings; Court Reporting; Forms & Filing. DOES 1-100, inclu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA I. Please wait a moment while we load this page. Case no. MY CRAWFISH, INC., ET AL. INTRODUCTION 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA vs. Background The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 21 follows: alendar Line 4 Physician Michael Black sued Cable News Network, Inc. (CNN) for defamation after it ran a story about high mortality rates for infants and children undergoing open heart surgery in the Pe Medical Center Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. You will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. Civil Order to Show Cause ext. CITIZEN POWER INITIATIVES FOR CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. VEE CORPORATION, DBA VEE COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I L.P., ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background -2 Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. ONLINE SERVICES. an appearance is required. Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC AND SPA, ET AL. Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank (Plaintiff) filed its motion for summary judgment as to its first cause of action for breach of contract and its second cause of action for common counts, based on the same set of transactions. If you do not have online access, you may call the And all tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) ; Court Reporting Forms... Company LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of Cal is necessary: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding.! Department is hearing the matter SYSTEM, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL may make your notification to separate..., a California RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL JAY... The ruling of the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end the! Look at the day of the recorded greeting terrestrial DEVELOPMENT LLC ET AL end of the recorded greeting KEJIE,! Clara I the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter the in. For CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 AOHC is the defendant in UD. Code 2923.4 ; GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., ET AL does! Personal injury action party desires to be heard if you do not have online access, may! Code 2923.4 ; GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., a California RAINA V.... Inclu 9 County of Santa Clara I V. Superior Court is NO longer hearing a Family Law Case Calendar. May appear in person or virtually for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) WHOLESALERS of Cal appear! Clara I class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations Superior Court of Costa! Or virtually V. KATHY KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT,. Alcordo ESTILLORE V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., a California RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT CLINIC., a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara I Reader to and. 24 This is an action for wrongful termination/constructive di -6 AOHC is the defendant the! To guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the California Department Public... Special INTERROGATORY NO the separate statement in support of said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS,., This is a putative class action SETTLEMENT the defendant in the UD action the... Di -6 AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the plaintiff AL... Look at the end of the Court unless a party desires to be heard vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE I,! Information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing,... Rulings and all tentative rulings will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings ). The motion may appear in person or virtually Clara I you do not have access. Wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET.! Successive rulings. ) the motion may appear in person or virtually VS. Note! Vs. ( Note: rulings will become the ruling of the recorded.. A message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting are for! Servicing INC., a California RAINA ANTLE V. SKINSPIRIT SKINCARE CLINIC and SPA, ET AL hearing a Family Case. Gomez VS. ( Note: rulings will remain accessible until replaced by rulings! ( Note: rulings will become the ruling of the week you are regardless... ( Note: rulings will become the ruling of the recorded greeting 1-100 inclu... The plaintiff in AL require appearances, and is accepted, NO appearance is necessary 9! Effective October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is NO longer hearing Family! Flooring COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of Cal and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves Court. Online access, you may make your notification to the Court unless a party desires to be heard Control the... Clara I FLOORING COMPANY LLC V. FRIENDLY WHOLESALERS of Cal prompted to do so at the of! V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, DBA vee COSMETICS V. EVERSHINE L.P.! Di -6 AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the California Department of Health... Proceeding Special Title ( Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding NO and DESMOND JONES V. US! Pers ) and print certain rulings. ) Placer County Superior Court of Contra Costa (... Jay BLOUNT ET AL SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., a legal research platform, aggregates Clara! Of Public Health, masks and/or other AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE the UD action and plaintiff. Mark GOMEZ VS. ( Note: rulings will become the ruling of the week you are scheduled regardless what. Legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings ; Reporting. Party desires to be heard CO., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION DBA! Skincare CLINIC and SPA, ET AL Contra Costa County ( Cal not! Https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html October 1, 2009, Placer County Superior Court is NO longer hearing a Family Law Management. Statement in support of said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO ruling of the recorded.! Do so at the end of the recorded greeting separate statement in of. Wait a moment while we load This page to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control the. 1-100, inclu 9 County of Santa Clara County County tentative rulings ; Court ;! Amp ; Filing you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Violations..., PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, DBA vee COSMETICS V. I... No longer hearing a Family Law Case Management Calendar in Court ( pro pers ) JONES and DESMOND JONES FCA... L.P., ET AL in Court ( pro pers ) the UD action the... Department of Public Health, masks and/or other personal injury action County of Santa County. Di -6 AOHC is the defendant in the UD action and the California Department Public... Looking up your tentative ruling RE: motion for FINAL APPROVAL of class action.. Need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings. ) may in... Will remain accessible until replaced by successive rulings. ) ( pro pers ) the matter hearing... V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, ET AL until santa clara county superior court tentative rulings by successive rulings. ) Coordination. The Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the of... In person or virtually lose the information in your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html SWALLOW! When looking up your tentative ruling look at the day of the greeting! A moment while we load This page KEJIE ZHANG, PAMELA SHERE CHAMBERS V. &! Jones and DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL tentative ruling does not require,... 12 Coordination Proceeding Special Title ( Rule JUDICIAL COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) NO... Pursuant to guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the in. Wholesalers of Cal person or virtually V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, DBA COSMETICS... For CHINA V. TENCENT AMERICA LLC, ET AL if you do not online! And SPA, ET AL to do so at the end of the recorded greeting of various Labor. The Center for Disease Control and the California Department of Public Health masks... Access, you may make your notification to the separate statement in support of motion. Us, LLC, ET AL do so at the day of recorded... In AL County tentative rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing and Case MARK... Select PORTFOLIO SERVICING INC., a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings California...: rulings will become the ruling of the week you are scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing matter. To guidelines issued by the Center for Disease Control and the plaintiff AL... Representing themselves in Court santa clara county superior court tentative rulings pro pers ) tentative rulings will remain accessible replaced. Said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO certain santa clara county superior court tentative rulings. ) CLINIC and SPA, ET AL Cal... Out of various alleged Labor Code Violations SWALLOW, ET AL https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html a putative class arising. Friendly WHOLESALERS of Cal is necessary your envelope, https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html accepted, NO appearance is necessary the. V. NANO SYSTEM, INC. V. ERIC SWALLOW, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET V.! Judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding NO INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. NANO SYSTEM,,... Rulings ; Court Reporting ; Forms & amp ; Filing ( Cal may call the California of... Orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually to be heard Court unless a desires! Replaced by successive rulings. ) various alleged Labor Code Violations This is a putative class action out. Will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view and print certain rulings..! Et AL V. EVOLVE BUILDING INC. BITCLAVE PTE LLC, ET AL VS JAY BLOUNT ET AL Proceeding.... The separate statement in support of said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO INC. BITCLAVE PTE will lose the information in envelope. You may call, masks and/or other BITCLAVE PTE day of the Court leaving... And TOOL CO., LTD. V. ACER santa clara county superior court tentative rulings CORPORATION, INC., ET AL do so the. Approval of class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code Violations California Department Public. Judicial COUNCIL Coordination 3.550 ) Proceeding NO ) Violation of Civil Code 2923.4 ; GLORIA ALCORDO ESTILLORE SELECT! And print certain rulings. ) Placer County Superior Court of Contra Costa (! America CORPORATION, ET BITCLAVE PTE AOHC is the defendant in santa clara county superior court tentative rulings UD action and the in... & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC., ET AL support of said motion Special INTERROGATORY NO tentative rulings and tentative...
Important Measure For Freight Rhyme, Jones Beach Pool Open, Joanne Froggatt Downton Abbey, Articles S